Yesterday's Weapons Forums

Discussion of history's firearms
Site Announcements

Attention New Members and those new registering!
We had a lot of problems with spammers and bot attacks with the stock measures provided by the software. The 7 for registration was a fix that we came up with on our own that has worked quite well. Yes it is a PIA for both you and administration to put you onto your chosen username.
If you come back on and your login does not work retry with your username without the 7.

Thanks for joining us from the administration.

It is currently Mon Apr 29, 2024 11:35 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: one of ther consequences of the govmnt getting into
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:24 am 
Offline
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:26 am
Posts: 18522
Location: Minnesota , USA
the farm management - and forceing fuel alternatives that are financialy unviable is that tax dollars for one eliminates anouther

we are seeing a totaly unviable fuel alternative propped up by tax dollars that essentialy have artificialy altered the farm markets pushed ahead - now the effects will be felt in loss of wildlife habbitat that was created by the use of tax dollars used to artificialy alter the farm markets

one conservation effort cancelling out anouther

ST. PAUL (AP) — Almost a third of the 2 million acres of Minnesota wetland set aside in the Conservation Reserve Program could leave the program in the next two years and go back to cropland.


The CRP contracts between the state and farmers are expiring. With rising commodity prices, farmers are finding they can make more money by farming the lands. That has conservationists worried about the environmental impact.

“A healthy wetland ... removes nitrates, removes phosphorus, keeps the water clean flowing into our lakes and rivers,” Kevin Lines, conservation easement manager for the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources said.

The conservation easements began during the farm crisis of the 1980s, less as a way to protect the environment and more as a way to get money into the rural economy. It pays farmers to take marginal land out of production, promising not to plow the land for 10 to 15 years. Last June, Lines had a goal of adding another 120,000 acres to the program. But farmers would only commit to 8,000 acres. Lines said he’s frustrated, but understands the economics involved.

When CRP started, corn and soybean prices were low. Today they’re rising, the value of land is increasing, and farmers say the programs don’t offer them enough to set the land aside.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:34 am 
Offline
Captain
Captain

Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2007 7:19 am
Posts: 822
Location: Northwest Arctic Borough
I see that big time;
No fences here to stop the Herds from migrating.
Fences cut off the elk, Pronghorn, Bison and others, a swell as farmers changing the feed in the area.
Im not anti farming, but farming has brough about big changes in habitat in large areas down south.

Dont they know were only going to be able to grow only so much corn for fuel? How about prices inna bad crop year and its effects on fuel prices? what about rising food prices? Whats more important, fuel or food?

Crazy world, :P though the upswing is that with alcohol in your gas, you wond have icing problems as much, in your fuel system.....

_________________
Hailstone
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group