Yesterday's Weapons Forums

Discussion of history's firearms
Site Announcements

Attention New Members and those new registering!
We had a lot of problems with spammers and bot attacks with the stock measures provided by the software. The 7 for registration was a fix that we came up with on our own that has worked quite well. Yes it is a PIA for both you and administration to put you onto your chosen username.
If you come back on and your login does not work retry with your username without the 7.

Thanks for joining us from the administration.

It is currently Tue Apr 16, 2024 4:30 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 8:04 am 
Offline
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:21 am
Posts: 515
From the G L & J P Herter book on professional loading and reloading.

1917 Enfield Rifles

Receiver and Bolt:
Made of nickel steel specificed in US Army Pamphlet no. 3098.
This steel could be made by the acid process, or the basic process, both were accepted.

Acid Process:
Carbon .30% to .40%
Manganese .50% to .70%
Nickel 3.00% to 3.75%
Phosphorus under .05%
Sulphur under .035%

Basic Process:
Carbon .35% to .45%
Manganese .50% to .70%
Nickel 3.25% to 3.75%
Silicon .10% to .20%
Phoshorus under .05%

Barrel Steel specified in US Army Pamphlet no.3098:
Carbon .45% to .55%
Manganese 1.10% to 1.35%
Silicon .20% to .30%
Phosphorus under .06%
Sulphur under .06%


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 12:03 pm 
Offline
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:26 am
Posts: 18522
Location: Minnesota , USA
IIRC from my reading on these , they were prised by the sporter crowd for their robust aspects , allowing for conversions to some of the wildcat cartriges being developed at the time , they were considered far better for these conversions than the M1903 type and the german mausers of the era ,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 4:49 pm 
Offline
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:21 am
Posts: 515
No doubt due to the high Nickel content of the steel.
I've read some amazing stuff about the strength and durability of high nickel steels.

The P-14 bolt face is generally a little tighter than you'd want for the belted magnum case heads but it's still much easier to open it up a hair for those cartridges than the Mauser or Springfield bolt face.

The Remington model 30 was a bit under rated in its day, and that fine rifle is basically an M1917 action without the rear sight ears.
The availability of cheap surplus M1917 rifles that could be easily modified to mimic the model 30 is probably one reason that rifle didn't sell better than it did.

There have been many fine sporters built on the M1917 and P-14 actions.
I wish I'd picked up one of the stripped actions advertised in Shotgun news years ago.
Some of those were P-14 receivers with M1917 bolts fitted so the rifles could be rebored or re barreled to 8mm Mauser.
Some actions were sans barrel while others still had a shot out or corroded 8mm barrel in place.

I guess they crack a few receivers while taking off the old barrels and figured they should leave that work up to the buyer.

Apparently the P-14 and M1917 barrels can be pretty hard to get off at times. Some recommend cutting the old barrel out of the receiver.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group