My thoughts on the rifle would be "if I want it, I'm going to buy it." The question is "why do you want it?"
I can think of the following reasons to want it:
1. I collect lee enfield rifles and this fits a spot in my collection.
2. I believe that military surplus rifles are a good investment and I'm going to resell it later and make a profit.
3. I'm a shooter and want to shoot this at my range or at military rifle competitions.
4. I'm a hunter and I'm going to sporterize the rifle to be my primary white tail rifle.
I'm sure there's more, but I think you'll get the gist from these examples.
Now the answers re the proposed rifle:
1. If you don't have one in your collection and this fits a spot, this is a good rifle as it is discretely import marked and has matching numbers. To a collector, the transverse screw is part of its history and adds to its provenance. So what if its been to India. India fought bravely with the British Army in many theatres of WW2 and while the screw is post WW2, there is nothing wrong with it having served post war in India. I have a Savage No.4 Mk1* with a South African Ownership mark on it - it doesn't make it any less collectable, if anything it adds to its rarity.
2. Military surplus with WW2 provenance will become more valuable (if un-monkeyed with) as time goes by. However, you're not likely to make much in your lifetime on this rather common example. Regarding price the lates Blue Book suggests No. 4's should sell in the $250 to $750 range depending on their condition and rarity. One of the distributors (I forget who) is selling No.4's at the moment for $159 but after you add tax and shipping you're paying $200 for a potentially mismatched unseen rifle!
3. These are military rifles so are not particularly accurate. The Savage probably has a 2 grooved barrel and would not be my choice for a military competition rifle.
4. Sporterizing military surplus rifles should be a sin sending you straight to hell - I just put this in for comparison purposes of peoples intent.
|