Yesterday's Weapons Forums

Discussion of history's firearms
Site Announcements

Attention New Members and those new registering!
We had a lot of problems with spammers and bot attacks with the stock measures provided by the software. The 7 for registration was a fix that we came up with on our own that has worked quite well. Yes it is a PIA for both you and administration to put you onto your chosen username.
If you come back on and your login does not work retry with your username without the 7.

Thanks for joining us from the administration.

It is currently Wed May 01, 2024 5:39 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 8:47 am 
Offline
Corporal
Corporal

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 11:59 am
Posts: 54
Hi,

I'm looking for a recommended hand load for this bullet in surplus Lake City brass.

Any thoughts? Any suggested links?

Thanks!

Richard


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:26 am 
Offline
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 9:20 am
Posts: 599
Location: Mpls, MN
I'm one of the IMR4895 users, with 150 fmjfb bullets for a "plinking" load. 48gr gets real close to the military spec.
For target shooting it's 4064 with a Sierra 168gr Matchking. 47gr gets real close to the Match spec of 2666fps.
My M1 with a Fulton barrel shoots both nicely but likes the 168's better.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2009 11:18 pm 
Offline
Feldmarschall
Feldmarschall
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:48 am
Posts: 1051
Location: Washington state
In his article "Reloading for the M1 Rifle, American Rifleman magazine, March 1986, John R. Clarke recommends:

Using Sierra 168 gr. HPBT match bullet (not Nosler)
Fed. 210 M primer
Lake City M brass

46.5 gr. IMR 3031 - 2697 fps.
47.5 gr. IMR 4895 - 2676 fps.
48.5 gr. IMR 4064 - 2635 fps.
48.0 gr. H4895 - 2706 fps.
47.5 WW 748 - 2587 fps.

You may have to tailor the load you use to your individual rifle; depending on wear factor in the gas system, etc., you may find that your own rifle likes a charge that's been increased a grain or a half-grain.

I shoot mostly 150-152 gr. bullets in my M-1 Rifles. Part of that has to do with my having a supply of pulled milsurp M-2 bullets, and part of it is because I tend to try to replicate service loads in my milsurp rifles. Many shooters find that they get increased accuracy from heavier bullets, specifically in the 173-180 gr. range. It's probably no accident that the service match bullet is 173 grains (Army tech manual says 175.5, but that's close enough).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 7:04 pm 
Offline
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 9:20 am
Posts: 599
Location: Mpls, MN
If you are still interested

http://www.gunsandammomag.com/cs/Satell ... agenum%3D1


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 10:09 am 
Offline
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:26 am
Posts: 18522
Location: Minnesota , USA
will these perform in a M1903A3 as well ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:38 pm 
Offline
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 9:20 am
Posts: 599
Location: Mpls, MN
Hi A square. Yes, these loads are used in both rifles.
If I were going to load up a match 03 load I would try 4350 with a 155gr bullet first.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group